Objective. To assess nurses’ knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) towards spontaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reporting. Methods. The mixed-method study was conducted following a quanti-qualitative sequential approach: a survey (using a KAP questionnaire) followed by a focus group was performed. Results. In the quantitative findings, responders (570 hospital nurses) declared that they were unaware of the pharmacovigilance system (58.1%, n = 331); where to find the reporting form (63.5%, n = 362); how fill it in (71.6%, n = 408); to whom and how to send it (65.8%, n = 375). Only 11.1% (n = 63) reported ADRs. The qualitative phase supported the quantitative findings and provided new information about other factors that condition ADR reporting: misinterpretation of the meaning of “reporting”, unawareness of nurses’ autonomy in ADR reporting and fear of consequences after ADR reporting. Conclusion. Nurses are not fully aware of their role in ADR reporting. We recommend educational interventions and management changes.

De Angelis, A., Giusti, A., Colaceci, S., Vellone, E., & Alvaro, R. (2015). Nurses' reporting of suspect adverse drug reactions: a mixed-methods study. ANNALI DELL'ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ, 51(4), 277-283 [10.4415/ANN_15_04_06].

Nurses' reporting of suspect adverse drug reactions: a mixed-methods study

GIUSTI, ANGELA;VELLONE, ERCOLE;ALVARO, ROSARIA
2015

Abstract

Objective. To assess nurses’ knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) towards spontaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reporting. Methods. The mixed-method study was conducted following a quanti-qualitative sequential approach: a survey (using a KAP questionnaire) followed by a focus group was performed. Results. In the quantitative findings, responders (570 hospital nurses) declared that they were unaware of the pharmacovigilance system (58.1%, n = 331); where to find the reporting form (63.5%, n = 362); how fill it in (71.6%, n = 408); to whom and how to send it (65.8%, n = 375). Only 11.1% (n = 63) reported ADRs. The qualitative phase supported the quantitative findings and provided new information about other factors that condition ADR reporting: misinterpretation of the meaning of “reporting”, unawareness of nurses’ autonomy in ADR reporting and fear of consequences after ADR reporting. Conclusion. Nurses are not fully aware of their role in ADR reporting. We recommend educational interventions and management changes.
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/45 - Scienze Infermieristiche Generali, Cliniche e Pediatriche
Settore MED/47 - Scienze Infermieristiche Ostetrico-Ginecologiche
English
Adverse drug reaction reporting systems; Knowledge; Nurses; Pharmacovigilance; Practices;
nurses, pharmacovigilance, adverse drug reaction, reporting systems, knowledge, practices
De Angelis, A., Giusti, A., Colaceci, S., Vellone, E., & Alvaro, R. (2015). Nurses' reporting of suspect adverse drug reactions: a mixed-methods study. ANNALI DELL'ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ, 51(4), 277-283 [10.4415/ANN_15_04_06].
De Angelis, A; Giusti, A; Colaceci, S; Vellone, E; Alvaro, R
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
De Angelis 2015 nurses reporting ADR.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 134.59 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
134.59 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2108/134731
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact