Exposure to human pathogenic viruses in recreational waters has been shown to cause disease outbreaks. In the context of Article 14 of the revised European Bathing Waters Directive 2006/7/EC (rBWD, CEU, 2006) a Europe-wide surveillance study was carried out to determine the frequency of occurrence of two human enteric viruses in recreational waters. Adenoviruses were selected based on their near-universal shedding and environmental survival, and noroviruses (NoV) selected as being the most prevalent gastroenteritis agent worldwide. Concentration of marine and freshwater samples was done by adsorption/ elution followed by molecular detection by (RT)-PCR. Out of 1410 samples, 553 (39.2%) were positive for one or more of the target viruses. Adenoviruses, detected in 36.4% of samples, were more prevalent than noroviruses (9.4%), with 3.5% GI and 6.2% GII, some samples being positive for both GI and GII. Of 513 human adenovirus-positive samples, 63 (12.3%) were also norovirus-positive, whereas 69 (7.7%) norovirus-positive samples were adenovirus-negative. More freshwater samples than marine water samples were viruspositive. Out of a small selection of samples tested for adenovirus infectivity,

Wyn Jones, A., Carducci, A., Cook, N., D’Agostino, M., Divizia, M., Fleischer, J., et al. (2011). Surveillance of adenoviruses and noroviruses in European recreational waters. WATER RESEARCH, 45(3), 1025-1038 [10.1016/j.watres.2010.10.015].

Surveillance of adenoviruses and noroviruses in European recreational waters

DIVIZIA, MAURIZIO;DONIA, DOMENICA TOMMASA;
2011-01-01

Abstract

Exposure to human pathogenic viruses in recreational waters has been shown to cause disease outbreaks. In the context of Article 14 of the revised European Bathing Waters Directive 2006/7/EC (rBWD, CEU, 2006) a Europe-wide surveillance study was carried out to determine the frequency of occurrence of two human enteric viruses in recreational waters. Adenoviruses were selected based on their near-universal shedding and environmental survival, and noroviruses (NoV) selected as being the most prevalent gastroenteritis agent worldwide. Concentration of marine and freshwater samples was done by adsorption/ elution followed by molecular detection by (RT)-PCR. Out of 1410 samples, 553 (39.2%) were positive for one or more of the target viruses. Adenoviruses, detected in 36.4% of samples, were more prevalent than noroviruses (9.4%), with 3.5% GI and 6.2% GII, some samples being positive for both GI and GII. Of 513 human adenovirus-positive samples, 63 (12.3%) were also norovirus-positive, whereas 69 (7.7%) norovirus-positive samples were adenovirus-negative. More freshwater samples than marine water samples were viruspositive. Out of a small selection of samples tested for adenovirus infectivity,
2011
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Settore MED/42 - IGIENE GENERALE E APPLICATA
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
adenoviruses; noroviruses; bathing water; river water; sea water
Wyn Jones, A., Carducci, A., Cook, N., D’Agostino, M., Divizia, M., Fleischer, J., et al. (2011). Surveillance of adenoviruses and noroviruses in European recreational waters. WATER RESEARCH, 45(3), 1025-1038 [10.1016/j.watres.2010.10.015].
Wyn Jones, A; Carducci, A; Cook, N; D’Agostino, M; Divizia, M; Fleischer, J; Gantzer, C; Gawler, A; Girones, R; Hoeller, C; De Roda Husman, A; Kay, D; Kozyra, I; Lopez Pila, J; Muscillo, M; Sao José Nascimento, M; Papageorgiou, G; Rutjes, S; Sellwood, J; Szewzyk, R; Wyer, M; significant contributions by Bofill Mash, S; Clementeh, P; Donia, Dt; Duarten, A; Gräberl, I; Hollisterp, W; Huberi, S; Iaconellim, M; La Rosam, G; Cuvelierk, B; Orgorzalyf, L; Pissarides, N; Rosannad, G; Salagnonc, E; Schneidere, O; Docters van Leeuwenj, A; Veranib, M; Wildegm, S
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/12558
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 233
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 217
social impact