Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the expected cost of a large-sized photovoltaic (PV) system (= 1 MW) in reaching grid parity, not taking into account any type of government incentives (now quite uncommon in industrialized countries). A PV system located in Southern Italy will be the subject of this assessment. Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents the case of a 1 MW ground-mounted PV system. The data regarding solar radiation on the surface of the modules and the relative solar diagrams were simulated and reported using PVSYST® 5.21 software.Toevaluate the profitability and solvency of the project, anumberof factors were taken into consideration: profitability indicators of net present value and internal rateofreturn,thedebtservicecoverageindicatorsofdebtservicecoverratioandloanlifecoverratioandtheirmean annual values (annual debt service cover ratio and annual loan life cover ratio, respectively).Asensitivity analysis with respect to the most critical element (weighted average cost of capital) gave strength to the results. Findings - The achievement of grid parity for 200kWPV systems is happening globally in areas with higher irradiation, but it clearly refers to residential utilities and is not applicable to large systems. The case study considers a power plant (= 1 MW) to assess the total cost that it would need to have to be economically advantageous. Research limitations/implications - This is an assessment made using a case which, given an average irradiance value in the area and the energy produced, can be used in all countries lying in the temperate zone. For other areas, a scaling coefficient would be needed. Practical implications - The paper is useful for understanding the order of cost, which must catch up to PV technology to make investments in power plants profitable in the absence of government incentives. It is also helpful for those who make government policies so that these may propose possible incentives commensurate with the actual difference between the value of the technology and the value of the investment. The study is also useful for a possible comparison with a system sharing the same characteristics (size, energy production) for off-grid use and customers. Originality/value - The study can be a valuable support for government policies to incentivate PV systems that contribute to a reduction of greenhouse gases and that help contain climate change. The case study represents a real case taken directly from a real project. This case study and its sustainable features have not been previously presented in a scientific journal.

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the expected cost of a large-sized photovoltaic (PV) system ([1] 1 MW) in reaching grid parity, not taking into account any type of government incentives (now quite uncommon in industrialized countries). A PV system located in Southern Italy will be the subject of this assessment. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents the case of a 1 MW ground-mounted PV system. The data regarding solar radiation on the surface of the modules and the relative solar diagrams were simulated and reported using PVSYST® 5.21 software.Toevaluate the profitability and solvency of the project, anumberof factors were taken into consideration: profitability indicators of net present value and internal rateofreturn,thedebtservicecoverageindicatorsofdebtservicecoverratioandloanlifecoverratioandtheirmean annual values (annual debt service cover ratio and annual loan life cover ratio, respectively).Asensitivity analysis with respect to the most critical element (weighted average cost of capital) gave strength to the results. Findings – The achievement of grid parity for 200kWPV systems is happening globally in areas with higher irradiation, but it clearly refers to residential utilities and is not applicable to large systems. The case study considers a power plant (- 1 MW) to assess the total cost that it would need to have to be economically advantageous. Research limitations/implications – This is an assessment made using a case which, given an average irradiance value in the area and the energy produced, can be used in all countries lying in the temperate zone. For other areas, a scaling coefficient would be needed. Practical implications – The paper is useful for understanding the order of cost, which must catch up to PV technology to make investments in power plants profitable in the absence of government incentives. It is also helpful for those who make government policies so that these may propose possible incentives commensurate with the actual difference between the value of the technology and the value of the investment. The study is also useful for a possible comparison with a system sharing the same characteristics (size, energy production) for off-grid use and customers. Originality/value – The study can be a valuable support for government policies to incentivate PV systems that contribute to a reduction of greenhouse gases and that help contain climate change. The case study represents a real case taken directly from a real project. This case study and its sustainable features have not been previously presented in a scientific journal.

Campisi, D., Morea, D., Farinelli, E. (2015). Economic sustainability of ground mounted photovoltaic systems: an Italian case study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 9(2), 156-175 [10.1108/IJESM-04-2014-0007].

Economic sustainability of ground mounted photovoltaic systems: an Italian case study

CAMPISI, DOMENICO;
2015-01-01

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the expected cost of a large-sized photovoltaic (PV) system ([1] 1 MW) in reaching grid parity, not taking into account any type of government incentives (now quite uncommon in industrialized countries). A PV system located in Southern Italy will be the subject of this assessment. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents the case of a 1 MW ground-mounted PV system. The data regarding solar radiation on the surface of the modules and the relative solar diagrams were simulated and reported using PVSYST® 5.21 software.Toevaluate the profitability and solvency of the project, anumberof factors were taken into consideration: profitability indicators of net present value and internal rateofreturn,thedebtservicecoverageindicatorsofdebtservicecoverratioandloanlifecoverratioandtheirmean annual values (annual debt service cover ratio and annual loan life cover ratio, respectively).Asensitivity analysis with respect to the most critical element (weighted average cost of capital) gave strength to the results. Findings – The achievement of grid parity for 200kWPV systems is happening globally in areas with higher irradiation, but it clearly refers to residential utilities and is not applicable to large systems. The case study considers a power plant (- 1 MW) to assess the total cost that it would need to have to be economically advantageous. Research limitations/implications – This is an assessment made using a case which, given an average irradiance value in the area and the energy produced, can be used in all countries lying in the temperate zone. For other areas, a scaling coefficient would be needed. Practical implications – The paper is useful for understanding the order of cost, which must catch up to PV technology to make investments in power plants profitable in the absence of government incentives. It is also helpful for those who make government policies so that these may propose possible incentives commensurate with the actual difference between the value of the technology and the value of the investment. The study is also useful for a possible comparison with a system sharing the same characteristics (size, energy production) for off-grid use and customers. Originality/value – The study can be a valuable support for government policies to incentivate PV systems that contribute to a reduction of greenhouse gases and that help contain climate change. The case study represents a real case taken directly from a real project. This case study and its sustainable features have not been previously presented in a scientific journal.
2015
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore ING-IND/35 - INGEGNERIA ECONOMICO-GESTIONALE
English
Senza Impact Factor ISI
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the expected cost of a large-sized photovoltaic (PV) system (= 1 MW) in reaching grid parity, not taking into account any type of government incentives (now quite uncommon in industrialized countries). A PV system located in Southern Italy will be the subject of this assessment. Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents the case of a 1 MW ground-mounted PV system. The data regarding solar radiation on the surface of the modules and the relative solar diagrams were simulated and reported using PVSYST® 5.21 software.Toevaluate the profitability and solvency of the project, anumberof factors were taken into consideration: profitability indicators of net present value and internal rateofreturn,thedebtservicecoverageindicatorsofdebtservicecoverratioandloanlifecoverratioandtheirmean annual values (annual debt service cover ratio and annual loan life cover ratio, respectively).Asensitivity analysis with respect to the most critical element (weighted average cost of capital) gave strength to the results. Findings - The achievement of grid parity for 200kWPV systems is happening globally in areas with higher irradiation, but it clearly refers to residential utilities and is not applicable to large systems. The case study considers a power plant (= 1 MW) to assess the total cost that it would need to have to be economically advantageous. Research limitations/implications - This is an assessment made using a case which, given an average irradiance value in the area and the energy produced, can be used in all countries lying in the temperate zone. For other areas, a scaling coefficient would be needed. Practical implications - The paper is useful for understanding the order of cost, which must catch up to PV technology to make investments in power plants profitable in the absence of government incentives. It is also helpful for those who make government policies so that these may propose possible incentives commensurate with the actual difference between the value of the technology and the value of the investment. The study is also useful for a possible comparison with a system sharing the same characteristics (size, energy production) for off-grid use and customers. Originality/value - The study can be a valuable support for government policies to incentivate PV systems that contribute to a reduction of greenhouse gases and that help contain climate change. The case study represents a real case taken directly from a real project. This case study and its sustainable features have not been previously presented in a scientific journal.
CO; 2; emission; Energy sector; Financial sector; Options value; Policy; Project economics; Renewable energies; Scenario analysis; Time series analysis;
CO<inf>2</inf> emission; Energy sector; Financial sector; Options value; Policy; Project economics; Renewable energies; Scenario analysis; Time series analysis; Energy (all); Strategy and Management1409 Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/info/journals/ijesm/ijesm.jsp
Campisi, D., Morea, D., Farinelli, E. (2015). Economic sustainability of ground mounted photovoltaic systems: an Italian case study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 9(2), 156-175 [10.1108/IJESM-04-2014-0007].
Campisi, D; Morea, D; Farinelli, E
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Paper_Campisi_Farinelli_Morea_IJESM.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: "Articolo principale"
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 1.22 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.22 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/118569
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 24
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact