This paper compares different channel coding schemes, such as the short Low-Density Parity-Check (LDPC) proposed by NASA for TC applications, and Reed Solomon (RS) codes, in presence of pulsed jammers that causes burst errors. The burst error patterns are generated also considering the occurrence of cycle slips due to the pulsed jammers. Moreover, the effectiveness of introducing interleavers of different depths is investigated for both channel codes. The comparison shows that RS codes represent a robust solution in presence of pulsed jammers and they provide a better trade off performance/latency than short LDPC codes.
Martinelli, P., Cianca, E., Simone, L. (2014). Comparison of channel codes in presence of pulsed jammers in TT&C links. In Proceedings of the 7th Advanced Satellite Multimedia Systems Conference and the 13th Signal Processing for Space Communications Workshop (ASMS/SPSC), 2014 (pp. 170-173). IEEE [10.1109/ASMS-SPSC.2014.6934540].
Comparison of channel codes in presence of pulsed jammers in TT&C links
CIANCA, ERNESTINA;SIMONE, LORENZO
2014-09-10
Abstract
This paper compares different channel coding schemes, such as the short Low-Density Parity-Check (LDPC) proposed by NASA for TC applications, and Reed Solomon (RS) codes, in presence of pulsed jammers that causes burst errors. The burst error patterns are generated also considering the occurrence of cycle slips due to the pulsed jammers. Moreover, the effectiveness of introducing interleavers of different depths is investigated for both channel codes. The comparison shows that RS codes represent a robust solution in presence of pulsed jammers and they provide a better trade off performance/latency than short LDPC codes.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ASMS2014.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
204.41 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
204.41 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
