In Italy, a long debate and several tentative exercises have gone before the institution of ‘Roma Capitale’. Nevertheless, no real critical thinking took place and diffused about what central role a European modern Capital should play within the framework of strategic reforms and innovative challenges. Specific studies and analysis, devoted to this topic, produce a vast literature and various references and include contributions from geography, law, economics, planning, sociology, etc. In Italian context, different ideological positions have emerged from the world of politics and academia, so to exclude solutions that are not à la carte’ From this point of view, in comparison with Paris, Rome should be loser. However, a strong push comes from Europe in order to find useful solutions absorbing long-term impacts generated by the crisis (2050 scenario). This support is profitable to develop the paper’s topic within a geographical-economic and political framework. The paper develops this point by some place evidence in order to distinguish the main territorial typologies of the two cities: the massive urbanism in Paris, the urban-rural settlement in Rome, the metropolitan polycentrism vs the urban centralism, the capability to be inclusive and to catch peripheral areas in the development process. This benchmarking suggests some institutional guidelines and orientations going over traditional regulatory schemes, including those generally required by institutional and territorial planning.

Prezioso, M., D'Orazio, A. (2015). Roma metropolitana: le dimensioni territoriali di una capitale. Un confronto a distanza con Parigi. In M. Cremaschi, A. Delpirou, D. Rivière, C. Salone (a cura di), Métropoles et Régions entre concurrences et complémentarités: regards croises France/Italie (pp. 142-159). Bologna : Planum Publisher.

Roma metropolitana: le dimensioni territoriali di una capitale. Un confronto a distanza con Parigi

PREZIOSO, MARIA;D'ORAZIO, ANGELA
2015-07-01

Abstract

In Italy, a long debate and several tentative exercises have gone before the institution of ‘Roma Capitale’. Nevertheless, no real critical thinking took place and diffused about what central role a European modern Capital should play within the framework of strategic reforms and innovative challenges. Specific studies and analysis, devoted to this topic, produce a vast literature and various references and include contributions from geography, law, economics, planning, sociology, etc. In Italian context, different ideological positions have emerged from the world of politics and academia, so to exclude solutions that are not à la carte’ From this point of view, in comparison with Paris, Rome should be loser. However, a strong push comes from Europe in order to find useful solutions absorbing long-term impacts generated by the crisis (2050 scenario). This support is profitable to develop the paper’s topic within a geographical-economic and political framework. The paper develops this point by some place evidence in order to distinguish the main territorial typologies of the two cities: the massive urbanism in Paris, the urban-rural settlement in Rome, the metropolitan polycentrism vs the urban centralism, the capability to be inclusive and to catch peripheral areas in the development process. This benchmarking suggests some institutional guidelines and orientations going over traditional regulatory schemes, including those generally required by institutional and territorial planning.
lug-2015
Settore M-GGR/02 - GEOGRAFIA ECONOMICO-POLITICA
Italian
Rilevanza internazionale
Capitolo o saggio
En dépit d’un débat qui compte plusieurs années de vie et malgré les nombreuses tentatives de parvenir à l’institution de ‘Rome Capitale’ avant le moment présent, on peut dire que pas véritable ‘pensée critique’ est répandue et enracinée à propos du rôle qu’une moderne Capitale européenne devrait jouer dans un cadre de reformes et innovations que se veulent stratégiques. La littérature est vaste sur le thème: les études spécialisés, en géographie, droit, économie, aménagement du territoire et planification, sociologie, ont contribués, dans le cas italien, à donner naissance à factions et idéologies Cette situation mène à l’exclusion de solutions qui ne soient pas ‘à la carte’. La comparaison avec Paris de ce point de vue serait perdante pour Rome. Mais la forte impulsion de l’Union Européenne pour trouver solutions utiles qu’aident à amortir l’impact de la crise sur le long terme (horizon 2050) se dévoile serviable à aborder le sujet avec le regard de la géographie économique et politique, se concentrant en particulier: sur la typologie territoriale dominante (plus massivement urbaine pour Paris, plus rural-urbaine pour Rome); sur le polycentrisme métropolitain par rapport à le centralisme urbain; la capacité d’inclusion et la capture des banlieues. L’exercice de benchmarking qui en résulte offre directives institutionnelles qui dépassent les traditionnels systèmes de réglementation, y compris ceux demandés par l’aménagement institutionnel et territoriale.
Ricerca svolta nell'ambito del programma di scambio Italia/Francia: Ecole française de Rome Lab’Urba UMR: Géographie-­‐cités Colloques international Métropoles et régions.
Prezioso, M., D'Orazio, A. (2015). Roma metropolitana: le dimensioni territoriali di una capitale. Un confronto a distanza con Parigi. In M. Cremaschi, A. Delpirou, D. Rivière, C. Salone (a cura di), Métropoles et Régions entre concurrences et complémentarités: regards croises France/Italie (pp. 142-159). Bologna : Planum Publisher.
Prezioso, M; D'Orazio, A
Contributo in libro
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Métropoles_et_Régions_Planum_Publisher_07_2015_Contributo_Prezioso_D'Orazio.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Roma metropolitana: le dimensioni territoriali di una capitale. Un confronto a distanza con Parigi
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 5.47 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.47 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
01_Métropoles_et_Régions_Planum_Publisher_07_2015_Estratto_Cover_Indice_Autori_IV.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: cover
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.39 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.39 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/115120
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact