Currently, men are younger at the time of diagnosis of prostate cancer and more interested in less invasive surgical approaches (traditional laparoscopy, 3D-laparoscopy, robotics). Outcomes of continence, erectile function, cancer cure, positive surgical margins and complication are well collected in the pentafecta rate. However, no comparative studies between 4th generation 3D-HD vision system laparoscopy and standard bi-dimensional laparoscopy have been reported. This study aimed to compare the operative, perioperative data and pentafecta rates between 2D and 3D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and to identify the actual role of 3D LRP in urology.
Bove, P., Iacovelli, V., Celestino, F., De Carlo, F., Vespasiani, G., FINAZZI AGRO', E. (2015). 3D vs 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in organ-confined prostate cancer: Comparison of operative data and pentafecta rates: A single cohort study. BMC UROLOGY, 15(1), 12 [10.1186/s12894-015-0006-9].
3D vs 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in organ-confined prostate cancer: Comparison of operative data and pentafecta rates: A single cohort study
BOVE, PIERLUIGI;CELESTINO, FRANCESCO;VESPASIANI, GIUSEPPE;FINAZZI AGRO', ENRICO
2015-02-01
Abstract
Currently, men are younger at the time of diagnosis of prostate cancer and more interested in less invasive surgical approaches (traditional laparoscopy, 3D-laparoscopy, robotics). Outcomes of continence, erectile function, cancer cure, positive surgical margins and complication are well collected in the pentafecta rate. However, no comparative studies between 4th generation 3D-HD vision system laparoscopy and standard bi-dimensional laparoscopy have been reported. This study aimed to compare the operative, perioperative data and pentafecta rates between 2D and 3D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and to identify the actual role of 3D LRP in urology.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
