The purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetric properties of small field electron beams shaped by circular Cerrobend blocks and stainless steel tubular applicators. Percentage depth dose curves, beam profiles, and output factors of small-size circular fields from 2 to 5 cm diameter, obtained either by tubular applicators and Cerrobend blocks, were measured for 6, 10, and 15 MeV electron beam energies. All measurements were performed using a PTW microDiamond 60019 premarket prototype. An overall similar behavior between the two collimating systems can be observed in terms of PDD and beam profiles. However, Cerrobend collimators produce a higher bremsstrahlung background under irradiation with high-energy electrons. In such irradiation condition, larger output factors are observed for tubular applicators. Similar dosimetric properties are observed using circular Cerrobend blocks and stainless steel tubular applicators at lower beam energies. However, Cerrobend collimators allow the delivery of specific beam shapes, conformed to the target area. On the other hand, in high-energy irradiation conditions, tubular applicators produce a lower bremsstrahlung contribution, leading to lower doses outside the target volume. In addition, the higher output factors observed at high energies for tubular applicators lead to reduced treatment times.

Di Venanzio, C., Marinelli, M., Tonnetti, A., VERONA RINATI, G., Bagala', P., Falco, M., et al. (2015). Comparison between small radiation therapy electron beams collimated by Cerrobend and tubular applicators. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 16(1), 329-335 [10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5186].

Comparison between small radiation therapy electron beams collimated by Cerrobend and tubular applicators

MARINELLI, MARCO;VERONA RINATI, GIANLUCA;BAGALA', PAOLO;
2015-01-01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetric properties of small field electron beams shaped by circular Cerrobend blocks and stainless steel tubular applicators. Percentage depth dose curves, beam profiles, and output factors of small-size circular fields from 2 to 5 cm diameter, obtained either by tubular applicators and Cerrobend blocks, were measured for 6, 10, and 15 MeV electron beam energies. All measurements were performed using a PTW microDiamond 60019 premarket prototype. An overall similar behavior between the two collimating systems can be observed in terms of PDD and beam profiles. However, Cerrobend collimators produce a higher bremsstrahlung background under irradiation with high-energy electrons. In such irradiation condition, larger output factors are observed for tubular applicators. Similar dosimetric properties are observed using circular Cerrobend blocks and stainless steel tubular applicators at lower beam energies. However, Cerrobend collimators allow the delivery of specific beam shapes, conformed to the target area. On the other hand, in high-energy irradiation conditions, tubular applicators produce a lower bremsstrahlung contribution, leading to lower doses outside the target volume. In addition, the higher output factors observed at high energies for tubular applicators lead to reduced treatment times.
2015
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore FIS/07 - FISICA APPLICATA (A BENI CULTURALI, AMBIENTALI, BIOLOGIA E MEDICINA)
English
Cerrobend; Diamond; Radiation therapy; Small electron beams; Tubular applicators; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging; Radiation; Instrumentation
http://www.jacmp.org/index.php/jacmp/article/download/5186/pdf_206
Di Venanzio, C., Marinelli, M., Tonnetti, A., VERONA RINATI, G., Bagala', P., Falco, M., et al. (2015). Comparison between small radiation therapy electron beams collimated by Cerrobend and tubular applicators. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 16(1), 329-335 [10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5186].
Di Venanzio, C; Marinelli, M; Tonnetti, A; VERONA RINATI, G; Bagala', P; Falco, M; Guerra, A; Pimpinella, M
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
142.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 390.77 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
390.77 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/113476
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact