The experimental observation of long- and short-latency components in both stimulus-frequency and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions admits a comprehensive explanation within the coherent reflection mechanism, in a linear active transmission-line cochlear model. A local complex reflectivity function associated with roughness was defined and analyzed by varying the tuning factor of the model, systematically showing, for each frequency, a multiple-peak spatial structure, compatible with the observed multiple-latency structure of otoacoustic emissions. Although this spatial pattern and the peak relative intensity changes with the chosen random roughness function, the multiple-peak structure is a reproducible feature of different "digital ears," in good agreement with experimental data. If one computes the predicted transmission delays as a function of frequency and position for each source, one gets a good match to the latency-frequency patterns that are directly computed from synthesized otoacoustic spectra using time-frequency analysis. This result clarifies the role of the spatial distribution of the otoacoustic emission sources, further supporting the interpretation of different-latency otoacoustic components as due to reflection sources localized at different places along the basilar membrane.
Sisto, R., Moleti, A., Shera, C. (2015). On the spatial distribution of the reflection sources of different latency components of otoacoustic emissions. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 137(2), 768-776 [10.1121/1.4906583].
On the spatial distribution of the reflection sources of different latency components of otoacoustic emissions
MOLETI, ARTURO;
2015-01-01
Abstract
The experimental observation of long- and short-latency components in both stimulus-frequency and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions admits a comprehensive explanation within the coherent reflection mechanism, in a linear active transmission-line cochlear model. A local complex reflectivity function associated with roughness was defined and analyzed by varying the tuning factor of the model, systematically showing, for each frequency, a multiple-peak spatial structure, compatible with the observed multiple-latency structure of otoacoustic emissions. Although this spatial pattern and the peak relative intensity changes with the chosen random roughness function, the multiple-peak structure is a reproducible feature of different "digital ears," in good agreement with experimental data. If one computes the predicted transmission delays as a function of frequency and position for each source, one gets a good match to the latency-frequency patterns that are directly computed from synthesized otoacoustic spectra using time-frequency analysis. This result clarifies the role of the spatial distribution of the otoacoustic emission sources, further supporting the interpretation of different-latency otoacoustic components as due to reflection sources localized at different places along the basilar membrane.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
JASA2015.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
690.04 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
690.04 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.