Purpose: We measured premature ejaculation related female sexual distress using a new diagnostic tool, the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised-Premature Ejaculation questionnaire. Materials and Methods: In this large-scale, Internet based population study we evaluated 2,109 women in a stable relationship during the last 6 months. The 1,361 women in the premature ejaculation group had no female sexual disorder but the partner had premature ejaculation alone. The 748 controls had no female sexual disorder and a partner without premature ejaculation. We determined questionnaire content and discriminant validity, internal consistency and testretest reliability. Multivariate logistic regression with propensity score reweighting was done to determine the clinical impact of demographics on the perception of sexual distress. Results: The questionnaire was well understood. Internal consistency was greater than 0.90 and 0.84 in the premature ejaculation and control groups, respectively. Test-retest reliability was 0.82 (95% CI 0.72–0.87) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.79–0.92) in the premature ejaculation and control groups, respectively. The questionnaire had a high AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.89–0.91). The new cutoff score of 12 or greater had 79.1% sensitivity (95% CI 73.8–82.5), 99.5% specificity (95% CI 98.0–100.0), 99.3% positive predictive value (95% CI 98.7–100.0) and 67.9% negative predictive value (95% CI 64.2–73.2). Median questionnaire scores were significantly higher in the premature ejaculation group than in controls (20, 95% CI 19–21 vs 6, 95% CI 6–7, p 0.0001). Logistic regression adjusted and unadjusted by propensity score indicated that women in the premature ejaculation group had a 7.12 (95% CI 5.98–10.14, p 0.0001) to 9.83 (95% CI 7.94–12.15) greater probability of sexual distress than controls. Conclusions: The Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised-Premature Ejaculation questionnaire fulfills psychometric requirements for measuring sexual distress related to partner sexual dysfunction.

Limoncin, E., Tomassetti, M., Gravina, G., Ciocca, G., Carosa, E., Di Sante, S., et al. (2013). Premature Ejaculation Results in Female Sexual Distress: Standardization and Validation of a New Diagnostic Tool for Sexual Distress, the FSDS-R-PE. THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 189(5), 1830-1835 [10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.007].

Premature Ejaculation Results in Female Sexual Distress: Standardization and Validation of a New Diagnostic Tool for Sexual Distress, the FSDS-R-PE

JANNINI, EMMANUELE ANGELO FRANCESCO
2013-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: We measured premature ejaculation related female sexual distress using a new diagnostic tool, the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised-Premature Ejaculation questionnaire. Materials and Methods: In this large-scale, Internet based population study we evaluated 2,109 women in a stable relationship during the last 6 months. The 1,361 women in the premature ejaculation group had no female sexual disorder but the partner had premature ejaculation alone. The 748 controls had no female sexual disorder and a partner without premature ejaculation. We determined questionnaire content and discriminant validity, internal consistency and testretest reliability. Multivariate logistic regression with propensity score reweighting was done to determine the clinical impact of demographics on the perception of sexual distress. Results: The questionnaire was well understood. Internal consistency was greater than 0.90 and 0.84 in the premature ejaculation and control groups, respectively. Test-retest reliability was 0.82 (95% CI 0.72–0.87) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.79–0.92) in the premature ejaculation and control groups, respectively. The questionnaire had a high AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.89–0.91). The new cutoff score of 12 or greater had 79.1% sensitivity (95% CI 73.8–82.5), 99.5% specificity (95% CI 98.0–100.0), 99.3% positive predictive value (95% CI 98.7–100.0) and 67.9% negative predictive value (95% CI 64.2–73.2). Median questionnaire scores were significantly higher in the premature ejaculation group than in controls (20, 95% CI 19–21 vs 6, 95% CI 6–7, p 0.0001). Logistic regression adjusted and unadjusted by propensity score indicated that women in the premature ejaculation group had a 7.12 (95% CI 5.98–10.14, p 0.0001) to 9.83 (95% CI 7.94–12.15) greater probability of sexual distress than controls. Conclusions: The Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised-Premature Ejaculation questionnaire fulfills psychometric requirements for measuring sexual distress related to partner sexual dysfunction.
2013
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/13 - ENDOCRINOLOGIA
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
testis, female, ejaculation, psychometrics, questionnaires
Limoncin, E., Tomassetti, M., Gravina, G., Ciocca, G., Carosa, E., Di Sante, S., et al. (2013). Premature Ejaculation Results in Female Sexual Distress: Standardization and Validation of a New Diagnostic Tool for Sexual Distress, the FSDS-R-PE. THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 189(5), 1830-1835 [10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.007].
Limoncin, E; Tomassetti, M; Gravina, G; Ciocca, G; Carosa, E; Di Sante, S; Gentile, V; Mirone, V; Montorsi, F; Lenzi, A; Jannini, Eaf
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
J Urol PE 2013.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 162.68 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
162.68 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/105738
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 11
  • Scopus 63
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 59
social impact