Conventional cytogenetics is considered the gold standard for evaluating CML during interferon (IFN) treatment. Drawbacks to this approach are the small number of metaphases available during IFN therapy and the impossibility of scoring interphase cells. We applied, besides cytogenetics, double-color FISH (dc-FISH) detection of BCR-ABL gene fusion to monitor 20 CML patients on IFN. dc-FISH easily detected 200 cells per specimen, while with cytogenetic examination a mean of 16.1 mitoses per sample were scored. Though the correlation of dc-FISH and cytogenetic data was good (r = 0.77, p < 0.001), the discrepancy between the two methods as regards the proportion of leukemic cells in the marrow was often important. dc-FISH detected a relevant proportion of BCR-ABL + cells in three patients classified as complete cytogenetic responders and showed that, after 9-12 months of IFN treatment, a significant reduction of BCR-ABL + cells was present in all the 20 patients tested. This might suggest that all CML patients are potentially responsive to IFN. Though more data are required, we think that dc-FISH is more informative than cytogenetic analysis for CML monitoring. Notably because of the simplicity of the procedure, this method could be easily standardized among different laboratories, thus permitting cross-comparison in therapeutic trials.

Cox Froncillo, M., Maffei, L., Cantonetti, M., DEL POETA, G., Lentini, R., Bruno, A., et al. (1996). FISH analysis for CML monitoring?. ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 73(3), 113-119 [10.1007/s002770050211].

FISH analysis for CML monitoring?

CANTONETTI, MARIA;DEL POETA, GIOVANNI;TRIBALTO, MAURIZIO;AMADORI, SERGIO
1996-01-01

Abstract

Conventional cytogenetics is considered the gold standard for evaluating CML during interferon (IFN) treatment. Drawbacks to this approach are the small number of metaphases available during IFN therapy and the impossibility of scoring interphase cells. We applied, besides cytogenetics, double-color FISH (dc-FISH) detection of BCR-ABL gene fusion to monitor 20 CML patients on IFN. dc-FISH easily detected 200 cells per specimen, while with cytogenetic examination a mean of 16.1 mitoses per sample were scored. Though the correlation of dc-FISH and cytogenetic data was good (r = 0.77, p < 0.001), the discrepancy between the two methods as regards the proportion of leukemic cells in the marrow was often important. dc-FISH detected a relevant proportion of BCR-ABL + cells in three patients classified as complete cytogenetic responders and showed that, after 9-12 months of IFN treatment, a significant reduction of BCR-ABL + cells was present in all the 20 patients tested. This might suggest that all CML patients are potentially responsive to IFN. Though more data are required, we think that dc-FISH is more informative than cytogenetic analysis for CML monitoring. Notably because of the simplicity of the procedure, this method could be easily standardized among different laboratories, thus permitting cross-comparison in therapeutic trials.
1996
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Settore MED/15 - MALATTIE DEL SANGUE
Settore MED/06 - ONCOLOGIA MEDICA
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
BCR-ABL; CML monitoring; IFN therapy; Philadelphia chromosome
Cox Froncillo, M., Maffei, L., Cantonetti, M., DEL POETA, G., Lentini, R., Bruno, A., et al. (1996). FISH analysis for CML monitoring?. ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 73(3), 113-119 [10.1007/s002770050211].
Cox Froncillo, M; Maffei, L; Cantonetti, M; DEL POETA, G; Lentini, R; Bruno, A; Masi, M; Tribalto, M; Amadori, S
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/69288
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
social impact