This study identified profiles of functional disability (FD) paralleled by increasing levels of disability. We assessed 96 subjects using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II). Clustering Based on Rules (ClBR) (a hybrid technique of Statistics and Artificial Intelligence) was used in the analysis. Four groups of subjects with different profiles of FD were ordered according to an increasing degree of disability: "Low," self-dependent subjects with no physical or emotional problems; "Intermediate I," subjects with low or moderate physical and emotional disability, with high perception of disability; "Intermediate II," subjects with moderate or severe disability concerning only physical problems related to self-dependency, without emotional problems; and "High," subjects with the highest degree of disability, both physical and emotional. The order of the four classes is paralleled by a significant difference (< 0.001) in the WHODAS II standardized global score. In this paper, a new ontology for the knowledge of FD, based on the use of ClBR, is proposed. The definition of four classes, qualitatively different and with ail increasing degree of FD, helps to appropriately place each patient in a group of individuals with a similar profile of disability and to propose standardized treatments for these groups.

Annicchiarico, R., Gibert, K., Cortes, U., Campana, F., Caltagirone, C. (2004). Qualitative profiles of disability. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 41(6A), 835-846.

Qualitative profiles of disability

CALTAGIRONE, CARLO
2004-01-01

Abstract

This study identified profiles of functional disability (FD) paralleled by increasing levels of disability. We assessed 96 subjects using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II). Clustering Based on Rules (ClBR) (a hybrid technique of Statistics and Artificial Intelligence) was used in the analysis. Four groups of subjects with different profiles of FD were ordered according to an increasing degree of disability: "Low," self-dependent subjects with no physical or emotional problems; "Intermediate I," subjects with low or moderate physical and emotional disability, with high perception of disability; "Intermediate II," subjects with moderate or severe disability concerning only physical problems related to self-dependency, without emotional problems; and "High," subjects with the highest degree of disability, both physical and emotional. The order of the four classes is paralleled by a significant difference (< 0.001) in the WHODAS II standardized global score. In this paper, a new ontology for the knowledge of FD, based on the use of ClBR, is proposed. The definition of four classes, qualitatively different and with ail increasing degree of FD, helps to appropriately place each patient in a group of individuals with a similar profile of disability and to propose standardized treatments for these groups.
2004
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/26 - NEUROLOGIA
English
artificial intelligence; cluster analysis; disability profiles; functional disability; Knowledge Discovery; qualitative analysis; rehabilitation
OUTCOME FOLLOWING REHABILITATION; CLINICAL-TRIALS; POSTSTROKE DEPRESSION; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; COGNITIVE STATUS; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; STROKE PATIENTS; MENTAL PRACTICE; NEURAL-NETWORK; HIP FRACTURE
Annicchiarico, R., Gibert, K., Cortes, U., Campana, F., Caltagirone, C. (2004). Qualitative profiles of disability. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 41(6A), 835-846.
Annicchiarico, R; Gibert, K; Cortes, U; Campana, F; Caltagirone, C
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/66057
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact