Background. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the differences in the body composition estimate of highly trained male athletes by three different methods: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BW) and skinfold thickness measurement (SFT). Methods. The study occurred during a non-intensive training period. The measurements were performed at the Human Physiology laboratory, Participants: forty-three male athletes (19 waterpolo, 9 judo, 15 karate) who exercised regularly at least three hours per day, six days per week. Measurements: DXA, BLS. and SFT measurements of percentage fat mass (%FM) and the amount of fat-free mass (FFM) were performed. Statistical analyses: the different %FM estimates by the three methods were compared using a one-may ANOVA, with posthoc Bonferroni test when values mere significantly different. The same test was used to compare FFM values, The coefficient of variation (CV%=100xSD/mean) was calculated for each methods, Methodological differences among the various methods were analysed with the method of Bland-Altman. Results. ANOVA test showed significant differences among the three methods, Ln particular, DXA significantly (p<0.001) over-estimated %FM(12.4+/-4.1%) and underestimate FFM (67.0+/-6.9 kg) respect to SFT (7.8+/-0.9% and 71.0+/-8.2 kg) and BW (9.9+/-1.4% and 69.4+/-7.9 kg), Also Bland-Altman comparison among the estimates indicated nide differences between methods. Conclusions. DSA provides different body composition estimates than those derived from skinfold thickness measurement and BIA, so that the methods should not be used interchangeably.

DE LORENZO, A., Bertini, I., Iacopino, L., Pagliato, E., Testolin, C., Testolin, G. (2000). Body composition measurement in highly trained male athletes: A comparison of three methods. JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS, 40(2), 178-183.

Body composition measurement in highly trained male athletes: A comparison of three methods

DE LORENZO, ANTONINO;IACOPINO, LEONARDO;
2000-01-01

Abstract

Background. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the differences in the body composition estimate of highly trained male athletes by three different methods: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BW) and skinfold thickness measurement (SFT). Methods. The study occurred during a non-intensive training period. The measurements were performed at the Human Physiology laboratory, Participants: forty-three male athletes (19 waterpolo, 9 judo, 15 karate) who exercised regularly at least three hours per day, six days per week. Measurements: DXA, BLS. and SFT measurements of percentage fat mass (%FM) and the amount of fat-free mass (FFM) were performed. Statistical analyses: the different %FM estimates by the three methods were compared using a one-may ANOVA, with posthoc Bonferroni test when values mere significantly different. The same test was used to compare FFM values, The coefficient of variation (CV%=100xSD/mean) was calculated for each methods, Methodological differences among the various methods were analysed with the method of Bland-Altman. Results. ANOVA test showed significant differences among the three methods, Ln particular, DXA significantly (p<0.001) over-estimated %FM(12.4+/-4.1%) and underestimate FFM (67.0+/-6.9 kg) respect to SFT (7.8+/-0.9% and 71.0+/-8.2 kg) and BW (9.9+/-1.4% and 69.4+/-7.9 kg), Also Bland-Altman comparison among the estimates indicated nide differences between methods. Conclusions. DSA provides different body composition estimates than those derived from skinfold thickness measurement and BIA, so that the methods should not be used interchangeably.
2000
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Settore MED/49 - SCIENZE TECNICHE DIETETICHE APPLICATE
English
body composition; athletes; densitometry, X-ray methods; skinfold thickness; electric impedance
DE LORENZO, A., Bertini, I., Iacopino, L., Pagliato, E., Testolin, C., Testolin, G. (2000). Body composition measurement in highly trained male athletes: A comparison of three methods. JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS, 40(2), 178-183.
DE LORENZO, A; Bertini, I; Iacopino, L; Pagliato, E; Testolin, C; Testolin, G
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/49500
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact