Purpose The primary aim of this multicenter retrospective analysis is to examine the role of(18)F-choline PET/CT as a diagnostic tool for staging and restaging prostate cancer (PCa) in a large population in the light of 10 years of clinical experience. A secondary aim of the study is to produce data on the predictors of a positive(18)F-choline PET/CT result in the setting of PCa primaries and biochemical recurrences. Materials and Methods This multicenter retrospective cohort study is based on data collected by 9 Italian nuclear medicine departments. Between October 2008 and September 2019, 3343 men underwent(18)F-choline PET/CT scans before receiving definitive treatments for a primary PCa or biochemical recurrence. Inclusion criteria were (1) histologically proven PCa (on surgical specimens or prostate biopsies from patients not treated surgically) and (2) availability of clinical and pathological data, including serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level at the time of PET/CT scanning. Results F-18-choline PET/CT was performed in 545 cases (16.4%) for cancer staging and in 2798 (83.6%) for restaging purposes, and the result was positive in 540 (99.1%) for the former and 1993 (71.2%) for the latter. A positive PET/CT result was always associated with a high Gleason score (>7) and high PSA levels (P< 0.01). The percentage of patients with a PSA threshold less than 1.0 ng/mL for performing PET/CT was higher in the years 2014 to 2019 (n = 341, 25% of cases) than during the previous period (n = 148, 16%; in 2008-2013). When used for staging purposes, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that PSA levels of 9.2, 16.4, and 16.6 ng/mL were the optimal cutoffs for distinguishing between positive and negative PET/CT findings for local disease, lymph node involvement, and metastasis, respectively. In the restaging setting, a PSA level of 1.27 ng/mL was the optimal cutoff for distinguishing between a positive and negative PET/CT scan. Conclusions F-18-choline PET/CT can help identify early recurrences, even in the case of low PSA levels (<1 ng/mL). Our data suggest that important improvements have been made in the interpretation of(18)F-choline images and in patient selection in the last 5 years.

Zattoni, F., Ravelli, I., Rensi, M., Capobianco, D., Borsatti, E., Baresic, T., et al. (2020). 10-Year clinical experience with 18F-choline PET/CT: an Italian multicenter retrospective assessment of 3343 patients. CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 45(8), 594-603 [10.1097/RLU.0000000000003125].

10-Year clinical experience with 18F-choline PET/CT: an Italian multicenter retrospective assessment of 3343 patients

Chiaravalloti A.;Schillaci O.;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Purpose The primary aim of this multicenter retrospective analysis is to examine the role of(18)F-choline PET/CT as a diagnostic tool for staging and restaging prostate cancer (PCa) in a large population in the light of 10 years of clinical experience. A secondary aim of the study is to produce data on the predictors of a positive(18)F-choline PET/CT result in the setting of PCa primaries and biochemical recurrences. Materials and Methods This multicenter retrospective cohort study is based on data collected by 9 Italian nuclear medicine departments. Between October 2008 and September 2019, 3343 men underwent(18)F-choline PET/CT scans before receiving definitive treatments for a primary PCa or biochemical recurrence. Inclusion criteria were (1) histologically proven PCa (on surgical specimens or prostate biopsies from patients not treated surgically) and (2) availability of clinical and pathological data, including serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level at the time of PET/CT scanning. Results F-18-choline PET/CT was performed in 545 cases (16.4%) for cancer staging and in 2798 (83.6%) for restaging purposes, and the result was positive in 540 (99.1%) for the former and 1993 (71.2%) for the latter. A positive PET/CT result was always associated with a high Gleason score (>7) and high PSA levels (P< 0.01). The percentage of patients with a PSA threshold less than 1.0 ng/mL for performing PET/CT was higher in the years 2014 to 2019 (n = 341, 25% of cases) than during the previous period (n = 148, 16%; in 2008-2013). When used for staging purposes, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that PSA levels of 9.2, 16.4, and 16.6 ng/mL were the optimal cutoffs for distinguishing between positive and negative PET/CT findings for local disease, lymph node involvement, and metastasis, respectively. In the restaging setting, a PSA level of 1.27 ng/mL was the optimal cutoff for distinguishing between a positive and negative PET/CT scan. Conclusions F-18-choline PET/CT can help identify early recurrences, even in the case of low PSA levels (<1 ng/mL). Our data suggest that important improvements have been made in the interpretation of(18)F-choline images and in patient selection in the last 5 years.
2020
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Settore MED/36 - DIAGNOSTICA PER IMMAGINI E RADIOTERAPIA
English
CT; choline; prostate cancer; recurrence; staging; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Choline; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Grading; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Prostatic Neoplasms; Radiopharmaceuticals; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Zattoni, F., Ravelli, I., Rensi, M., Capobianco, D., Borsatti, E., Baresic, T., et al. (2020). 10-Year clinical experience with 18F-choline PET/CT: an Italian multicenter retrospective assessment of 3343 patients. CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 45(8), 594-603 [10.1097/RLU.0000000000003125].
Zattoni, F; Ravelli, I; Rensi, M; Capobianco, D; Borsatti, E; Baresic, T; Chiaravalloti, A; Schillaci, O; Alongi, P; Bartolotta, Tv; Rambaldi, I; Bartolomei, M; Farsad, M; Tredici, M; Donner, D; Chierichetti, F; Trifiro, G; Brugola, E; Burei, M; Dal Moro, F; Cecchin, D; Evangelista, L
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/278567
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact