The proven efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in high-risk patients is leading to the expansion of its indications toward lower-risk patients. However, this shift is not supported by meaningful evidence of its benefit over surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This analysis aims to describe outcomes of TAVI versus SAVR in low-risk patients.
Rosato, S., Santini, F., Barbanti, M., Biancari, F., D'Errigo, P., Onorati, F., et al. (2016). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients. CIRCULATION. CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS., 9(5), e003326 [10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003326].
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients
RUVOLO, GIOVANNI;NARDI, PAOLO
2016-01-01
Abstract
The proven efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in high-risk patients is leading to the expansion of its indications toward lower-risk patients. However, this shift is not supported by meaningful evidence of its benefit over surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This analysis aims to describe outcomes of TAVI versus SAVR in low-risk patients.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Observat CIRCULATION CVINT- 2016.pdf
accesso aperto
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
819.37 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
819.37 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
