Comparisons of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis remain sparse or limited by a short follow-up. We sought to evaluate early and midterm outcomes of consecutive patients (n = 618) undergoing successful TAVI (n = 218) or isolated SAVR (n = 400) at 2 centers. The primary end point was incidence of Valvular Academic Research Consortium-defined major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events (MACCEs) up to 1 year. Control of potential confounders was attempted with extensive statistical adjustment by covariates and/or propensity score. In-hospital MACCEs occurred in 73 patients (11.8%) and was more frequent in patients treated with SAVR compared to those treated with TAVI (7.8% vs 14.0%, p = 0.022). After addressing potential confounders using 3 methods of statistical adjustment, SAVR was consistently associated with a higher risk of MACCEs than TAVI, with estimates of relative risk ranging from 2.2 to 2.6 at 30 days, 2.3 to 2.5 at 6 months, and 2.0 to 2.2 at 12 months. This difference was driven by an adjusted increased risk of life-threatening bleeding at 6 and 12 months and stroke at 12 months with SAVR. Conversely, no differences in adjusted risk of death, stroke and myocardial infarction were noted between TAVI and SAVR at each time point. In conclusion, in a large observational registry with admitted potential for selection bias and residual confounding, TAVI was not associated with a higher risk of 1-year MACCEs compared to SAVR. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2012;109:1487-1493)

Tamburino, C., Barbanti, M., Capodanno, D., Mignosa, C., Gentile, M., Aruta, P., et al. (2012). Comparison of complications and outcomes to one year of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 109(10), 1487-1493 [10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.01.364].

Comparison of complications and outcomes to one year of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis

Cadoni A.;Cammalleri V.;Ussia G. P.
2012-01-01

Abstract

Comparisons of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis remain sparse or limited by a short follow-up. We sought to evaluate early and midterm outcomes of consecutive patients (n = 618) undergoing successful TAVI (n = 218) or isolated SAVR (n = 400) at 2 centers. The primary end point was incidence of Valvular Academic Research Consortium-defined major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events (MACCEs) up to 1 year. Control of potential confounders was attempted with extensive statistical adjustment by covariates and/or propensity score. In-hospital MACCEs occurred in 73 patients (11.8%) and was more frequent in patients treated with SAVR compared to those treated with TAVI (7.8% vs 14.0%, p = 0.022). After addressing potential confounders using 3 methods of statistical adjustment, SAVR was consistently associated with a higher risk of MACCEs than TAVI, with estimates of relative risk ranging from 2.2 to 2.6 at 30 days, 2.3 to 2.5 at 6 months, and 2.0 to 2.2 at 12 months. This difference was driven by an adjusted increased risk of life-threatening bleeding at 6 and 12 months and stroke at 12 months with SAVR. Conversely, no differences in adjusted risk of death, stroke and myocardial infarction were noted between TAVI and SAVR at each time point. In conclusion, in a large observational registry with admitted potential for selection bias and residual confounding, TAVI was not associated with a higher risk of 1-year MACCEs compared to SAVR. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2012;109:1487-1493)
2012
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/11 - MALATTIE DELL'APPARATO CARDIOVASCOLARE
English
Aged; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Echocardiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Humans; Incidence; Italy; Male; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Survival Rate; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Cardiac Catheterization
Tamburino, C., Barbanti, M., Capodanno, D., Mignosa, C., Gentile, M., Aruta, P., et al. (2012). Comparison of complications and outcomes to one year of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 109(10), 1487-1493 [10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.01.364].
Tamburino, C; Barbanti, M; Capodanno, D; Mignosa, C; Gentile, M; Aruta, P; Pistritto, Am; Bonanno, C; Bonura, S; Cadoni, A; Gulino, S; Di Pasqua, Mc; Cammalleri, V; Scarabelli, M; Mule, M; Imme, S; Del Campo, G; Ussia, Gp
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/228579
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 52
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 52
social impact