This study aims to determine if, in children, subjective perception of space is modulated by the experience of reaching distal objects by means of tools and verbal labels. We presented 7-15-year-old participants with objects located in the near and far space, and in the threshold area between these spaces (border space). Before and after a training session, separate groups of participants estimated objects' location by providing a verbal estimation of their distance (n = 12) or by rolling a toy car to match their location (motor-based estimation; n = 16). The training session required interaction with the targets (i.e., actively experiencing the perceived distance) and included use of a rake or a linguistic label when far objects were involved. A control condition in which training implied use of a short, ineffective tool was also tested (n = 6). Results showed that verbal estimations were not affected by the training phase (p > .05). In contrast, training modulated motor-based estimations relative to border space. Specifically, maximal distance of toy car displacements was reduced following all kinds of training (p < .01). These results indicate that, similarly to adults, the boundary between near and far space is not fixed in children and that both active tool use and verbal labels can modulate this uncertain boundary.

Scorolli, C., Daprati, E., Nico, D., Borghi, A. (2015). Reaching for Objects or Asking for them: Distance Estimation in 7- to 15-Year-Old Children. JOURNAL OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR, 48(2), 183-191 [10.1080/00222895.2015.1070787].

Reaching for Objects or Asking for them: Distance Estimation in 7- to 15-Year-Old Children

DAPRATI, ELENA;
2015-01-01

Abstract

This study aims to determine if, in children, subjective perception of space is modulated by the experience of reaching distal objects by means of tools and verbal labels. We presented 7-15-year-old participants with objects located in the near and far space, and in the threshold area between these spaces (border space). Before and after a training session, separate groups of participants estimated objects' location by providing a verbal estimation of their distance (n = 12) or by rolling a toy car to match their location (motor-based estimation; n = 16). The training session required interaction with the targets (i.e., actively experiencing the perceived distance) and included use of a rake or a linguistic label when far objects were involved. A control condition in which training implied use of a short, ineffective tool was also tested (n = 6). Results showed that verbal estimations were not affected by the training phase (p > .05). In contrast, training modulated motor-based estimations relative to border space. Specifically, maximal distance of toy car displacements was reduced following all kinds of training (p < .01). These results indicate that, similarly to adults, the boundary between near and far space is not fixed in children and that both active tool use and verbal labels can modulate this uncertain boundary.
2015
Online ahead of print
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore M-PSI/02 - PSICOBIOLOGIA E PSICOLOGIA FISIOLOGICA
Settore BIO/09 - FISIOLOGIA
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
body representation; children; distance estimation; embodied cognition; reaching space; space perception; tool use
Scorolli, C., Daprati, E., Nico, D., Borghi, A. (2015). Reaching for Objects or Asking for them: Distance Estimation in 7- to 15-Year-Old Children. JOURNAL OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR, 48(2), 183-191 [10.1080/00222895.2015.1070787].
Scorolli, C; Daprati, E; Nico, D; Borghi, A
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Scorolli_et_al 2015.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 1.04 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.04 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/123814
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact